In his introduction to Paul Klee’s pamphlet
‘On modern art’, Herbert Read explains that Klee defends the
right of the artist to create his own order of reality. But this
transcendental world…can only be created if the artist obeys
certain rules, implicit in the natural order. Like Klee, I
am drawn to following ‘certain rules’, in order to show what is
typical, rather than what is individual. This search for general
patterns and principles leads me to a serial approach to
artmaking that allows an in-depth exploration of relatively few
visual elements. My palette is largely limited to blues and
reddish-browns, the colours of sky and earth. The shapes I use
are mainly the hemisphere, the circle, and, more rarely, the
triangle and square. My work evolves through variations on these
themes, playing with parameters such as rhythm, colour, tone,
placement, etc in a highly conscious and at the same time
organically unfolding way. The element of repetition inherent in
this approach serves as an essential means of spiritual/artistic
discipline. It forms the basis for a creative process that is
not concerned with expressing a temporary, subjective emotional
state or with the representation of nature. I don’t spend time
choosing what to paint; rather the creative process is carried
along by necessities arising from the art materials and images
themselves. A.S.Byatt, in her novel ‘Whistling Woman’ talks
about the adequate intelligence of the Master [Vermeer].
Who had set himself problems only he could solve, and had
solved them, and made a mystery.
My background in rhythmics, which provided a
thorough immersion in principles of improvisation in music and
movement, no doubt plays an influential role in making art in
this systematic, and naturally evolving way, where formation
is as important as form. This approach to creative work
is by no means unique. Klee noted in his diary: …to adapt
oneself to the contents of the paint box is more important than
nature and its study.
Nature rarely presents ‘perfect’ geometrical
forms, and neither do I. My circles are more like pebbles than
marbles and there are no straight edges except in the framing.
Nevertheless, there is an instinctive attraction to these shapes
(and I am here in the company of many other artists). It can
perhaps be interpreted as an attempt to control nature, to find
order in chaos. This motivation can also be attributed to the
performance of ritual.
Looking at the whole body of the work, I
notice the re-occurrence of the shape of the hemisphere as
perhaps one of the most striking and enduring features. It can
be interpreted as straightness folding. Whereas a straight line
communicates a one-directional, intellectual stance, a curve
indicates movement and change. In my work it appears as
mountain, lake, cup, gate, mask, if one wants to see it in a
representational way, or more abstractly, simply as halves of a
disc. The shape of the bowl appears more frequently than any
other: a symbol for receptivity, and as such, a part of the
shrines of many traditions. Divinity is signalled by the
rounded earthen jar, heavy-laden with water, the fluid of
life….. The making of the pot or image is conceived of as in
itself an offering, or as an act of self-consecration to the
deity. Mookerjee, 1985: 20
Inherent in the shape lies a dynamic tension
derived from the implicit possibility of the wholeness of the
circle, the resolving of opposites of male and female, earth and
sky, etc. In the meditation series I play with the
opposite direction of the curves and the tension between the
two. In some of my pieces, the open form of the semi-disk
resolves into the complete, full (or empty) circle. It would not
be possible though to depict only wholeness - it seems that the
creative process needs to open up the tension between ‘the 2’
(as opposed to ‘the1’) again and again. I find the symbol
irresistible; it seems to be one of these archetypes that one
finds in all cultures, particularly in religious contexts (the
arches of church windows, the cup or bowl). In Tibetan Buddhism
we find the term samputa, which literally means a
hemispherical bowl, or the hollow space between two bowls placed
together. Tibetan renderings of samputa imply either
‘perfect union’ or ‘mystic embrace’. There are reverberations of
these curves throughout the body: from the white moon in
fingernails to the scull cup; from the arches of the feet to the
dome of the diaphragm.
Some of the pieces show the traces of ritual
activity in a direct and non-adulterated way. In the rhythm
of breathing was made by pushing, with my finger, into
freshly prepared paper pulp (not unlike the sand drawings of
hunter-gatherers). They are records of actual happenings and
perhaps speak to the viewer with a certain immediacy that almost
makes him/her a partaker in the ritual. Paper making as a
technique of artmaking is a highly repetitive process and
invites reflections on the difference between routine and
ritual. The presence of mindfulness can turn any routine
activity (like washing the dishes) into a ritual that enhances a
sense of meaning. And without this quality of alertness,
traditional religious rituals degenerate into empty forms.
Whilst spiritually alive rituals will display
a certain formal stringency and connection with tradition
through repetition, they also need to allow for variation and
contemporary relevance. This patterning of ‘theme and variation’
can be studied in the rituals of contemporary hunter/gatherers.
The Wagenia, on the banks of the river Congo, possess a
symbolic repertoire that they experiment with and vary according
to occasion and circumstance. The deliberate and playful control
of the given parameters of a ceremony or work of art belongs to
the essential characteristics of ritual. Ritual mutates